From 888e33f55d3bf80247a309aa9323be9b791b7dd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Kaludercic <philip.kaludercic@fau.de> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:04:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use a more consistent notation in the bisimulation sketch --- sketches.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sketches.tex b/sketches.tex index 4db8d03..9c22580 100644 --- a/sketches.tex +++ b/sketches.tex @@ -332,8 +332,8 @@ \((C, c) \xleftarrow{\outm{1}} (R, r) \xrightarrow{\outm{2}} (D, d)\) we can construct a \de{pullback} \(\mathsf{Pb}(\outm{1}, \outm{2}) = (P, p)\). In \(\Set\) this - exist necessarily, meaning that the \des{morphism} - \((C, c) \xrightarrow{q_1} (P, p) \xleftarrow{p_2} (D, d)\) provide + exist necessarily, meaning that the cone \des{morphism} + \((C, c) \xrightarrow{p_1} (P, p) \xleftarrow{p_2} (D, d)\) provide the intended \defn{beheqiv}{behavioural equivalence}. \end{proof} -- GitLab