Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
AndroidSystemSEPolicy
Manage
Activity
Members
Code
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Analyze
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Werner Sembach
AndroidSystemSEPolicy
Commits
5499a78f
Commit
5499a78f
authored
8 years ago
by
Jeff Vander Stoep
Committed by
android-build-merger
8 years ago
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Plain Diff
Merge "Enforce one HAL per domain." am:
d3266558
am:
35823ad0
Change-Id: I53b1c43e6ca7c4978c082092a9015313e2c53eea
parents
5f4f0333
35823ad0
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
public/hal_neverallows.te
+33
-0
33 additions, 0 deletions
public/hal_neverallows.te
with
33 additions
and
0 deletions
public/hal_neverallows.te
+
33
−
0
View file @
5499a78f
...
...
@@ -17,3 +17,36 @@ neverallow {
-hal_wifi_supplicant_server
-rild
} domain:{ tcp_socket udp_socket rawip_socket } *;
###
# HALs are defined as an attribute and so a given domain could hypothetically
# have multiple HALs in it (or even all of them) with the subsequent policy of
# the domain comprised of the union of all the HALs.
#
# This is a problem because
# 1) Security sensitive components should only be accessed by specific HALs.
# 2) hwbinder_call and the restrictions it provides cannot be reasoned about in
# the platform.
# 3) The platform cannot reason about defense in depth if there are
# monolithic domains etc.
#
# As an example, hal_keymaster and hal_gatekeeper can access the TEE and while
# its OK for them to share a process its not OK with them to share processes
# with other hals.
#
# The following neverallow rules, in conjuntion with CTS tests, assert that
# these security principles are adhered to.
#
# Do not allow a hal to exec another process without a domain transition.
# TODO remove exemptions.
neverallow {
halserverdomain
-hal_dumpstate_server
-rild
} { file_type fs_type }:file execute_no_trans;
# Do not allow a process other than init to transition into a HAL domain.
neverallow { domain -init } halserverdomain:process transition;
# Only allow transitioning to a domain by running its executable. Do not
# allow transitioning into a HAL domain by use of seclabel in an
# init.*.rc script.
neverallow * halserverdomain:process dyntransition;
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment