Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6b75d099 authored by Jeff Sharkey's avatar Jeff Sharkey
Browse files

Let's reinvent storage, yet again!

Now that we're treating storage as a runtime permission, we need to
grant read/write access without killing the app.  This is really
tricky, since we had been using GIDs for access control, and they're
set in stone once Zygote drops privileges.

The only thing left that can change dynamically is the filesystem
itself, so let's do that.  This means changing the FUSE daemon to
present itself as three different views:

/mnt/runtime_default/foo - view for apps with no access
/mnt/runtime_read/foo - view for apps with read access
/mnt/runtime_write/foo - view for apps with write access

There is still a single location for all the backing files, and
filesystem permissions are derived the same way for each view, but
the file modes are masked off differently for each mountpoint.

During Zygote fork, it wires up the appropriate storage access into
an isolated mount namespace based on the current app permissions.  When
the app is granted permissions dynamically at runtime, the system
asks vold to jump into the existing mount namespace and bind mount
the newly granted access model into place.

avc: denied { sys_chroot } for capability=18 scontext=u:r:vold:s0 tcontext=u:r:vold:s0 tclass=capability permissive=1
avc: denied { mounton } for path="/storage" dev="tmpfs" ino=4155 scontext=u:r:vold:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:storage_file:s0 tclass=dir permissive=1
avc: denied { unmount } for scontext=u:r:zygote:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:tmpfs:s0 tclass=filesystem permissive=0

Bug: 21858077
Change-Id: Ie481d190c5e7a774fbf80fee6e39a980f382967e
parent 6ef32753
No related branches found
No related tags found
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment