- Mar 07, 2014
-
-
Stephen Smalley authored
Change-Id: I764086a83d89d5c94c13400cab590933727d261b Signed-off-by:
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
-
- Feb 25, 2014
-
-
Stephen Smalley authored
Replace * or any permission set containing create with create_socket_perms or create_stream_socket_perms. Add net_domain() to all domains using network sockets and delete rules already covered by domain.te or net.te. For netlink_route_socket, only nlmsg_write needs to be separately granted to specific domains that are permitted to modify the routing table. Clarification: read/write permissions are just ability to perform read/recv() or write/send() on the socket, whereas nlmsg_read/ nlmsg_write permissions control ability to observe or modify the underlying kernel state accessed via the socket. See security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c in the kernel for the mapping of netlink message types to nlmsg_read or nlmsg_write. Delete legacy rule for b/12061011. This change does not touch any rules where only read/write were allowed to a socket created by another domain (inherited across exec or received across socket or binder IPC). We may wish to rewrite some or all of those rules with the rw_socket_perms macro but that is a separate change. Change-Id: Ib0637ab86f6d388043eff928e5d96beb02e5450e Signed-off-by:
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
-
- Feb 21, 2014
-
-
Stephen Smalley authored
<5>[ 216.710405] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:17): avc: denied { use } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="socket:[9368]" dev="sockfs" ino=9368 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=fd <5>[ 216.710553] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:18): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="socket:[9368]" dev="sockfs" ino=9368 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=netlink_kobject_uevent_socket <5>[ 216.710727] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:19): avc: denied { read } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="pipe:[9369]" dev="pipefs" ino=9369 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=fifo_file <5>[ 216.710872] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:20): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="socket:[8214]" dev="sockfs" ino=8214 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket <5>[ 216.711037] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:21): avc: denied { write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="pipe:[9369]" dev="pipefs" ino=9369 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=fifo_file <5>[ 216.711208] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:22): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="socket:[9370]" dev="sockfs" ino=9370 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=netlink_route_socket <5>[ 216.711334] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:23): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="socket:[9372]" dev="sockfs" ino=9372 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=netlink_nflog_socket <5>[ 216.711513] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:24): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" path="socket:[11078]" dev="sockfs" ino=11078 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:netd:s0 tclass=udp_socket <5>[ 216.713390] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:25): avc: denied { dac_override } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" capability=1 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=capability <5>[ 216.713528] type=1400 audit(1392934645.702:26): avc: denied { read write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" name="tun" dev="tmpfs" ino=6127 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:tun_device:s0 tclass=chr_file <5>[ 314.513898] type=1400 audit(1392934743.501:42): avc: denied { setopt } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=netlink_route_socket <5>[ 314.514482] type=1400 audit(1392934743.501:43): avc: denied { getattr } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=netlink_route_socket <5>[ 314.515196] type=1400 audit(1392934743.501:44): avc: denied { write } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=netlink_route_socket <5>[ 314.516077] type=1400 audit(1392934743.501:45): avc: denied { connect } for pid=2273 comm="clatd" scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=netlink_route_socket <5>[ 22.257024] type=1400 audit(1393016186.443:12): avc: denied { open } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" name="tun" dev="tmpfs" ino=6117 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:tun_device:s0 tclass=chr_file <5>[ 22.257274] type=1400 audit(1393016186.443:13): avc: denied { net_admin } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" capability=12 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=capability <5>[ 22.257445] type=1400 audit(1393016186.443:14): avc: denied { write } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" name="forwarding" dev="proc" ino=10684 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:proc_net:s0 tclass=file <5>[ 22.257618] type=1400 audit(1393016186.443:15): avc: denied { setgid } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" capability=6 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=capability <5>[ 22.257753] type=1400 audit(1393016186.443:16): avc: denied { setuid } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" capability=7 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=capability <5>[ 22.385005] type=1400 audit(1393016186.573:17): avc: denied { ioctl } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" path="/dev/tun" dev="tmpfs" ino=6117 scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:object_r:tun_device:s0 tclass=chr_file <5>[ 22.385269] type=1400 audit(1393016186.573:18): avc: denied { create } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=tun_socket <5>[ 22.388955] type=1400 audit(1393016186.573:19): avc: denied { nlmsg_write } for pid=1934 comm="clatd" scontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tcontext=u:r:clatd:s0 tclass=netlink_route_socket Change-Id: Ic760597df1aa4b33b3cb6e9a504dbcbd6f5d0116 Signed-off-by:
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
-
- Feb 11, 2014
-
-
Stephen Smalley authored
Otherwise we'll never see denials in userdebug or eng builds and never make progress on confining it. clatd does exist in AOSP and is built by default, and is started via netd. Change-Id: Iee6e0845fad7647962d73cb6d047f27924fa799a Signed-off-by:
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
-
- Oct 21, 2013
-
-
Nick Kralevich authored
This change removes the permissive line from unconfined domains. Unconfined domains can do (mostly) anything, so moving these domains into enforcing should be a no-op. The following domains were deliberately NOT changed: 1) kernel 2) init In the future, this gives us the ability to tighten up the rules in unconfined, and have those tightened rules actually work. When we're ready to tighten up the rules for these domains, we can: 1) Remove unconfined_domain and re-add the permissive line. 2) Submit the domain in permissive but NOT unconfined. 3) Remove the permissive line 4) Wait a few days and submit the no-permissive change. For instance, if we were ready to do this for adb, we'd identify a list of possible rules which allow adbd to work, re-add the permissive line, and then upload those changes to AOSP. After sufficient testing, we'd then move adb to enforcing. We'd repeat this for each domain until everything is enforcing and out of unconfined. Change-Id: If674190de3262969322fb2e93d9a0e734f8b9245
-
- Aug 05, 2013
-
-
Lorenzo Colitti authored
Bug: 10175701 Change-Id: I185df22bdbaafd56725760ec6c71340b67455046
-